MovieChat Forums > Politics > Kellyanne Conartist loses her mind over ...

Kellyanne Conartist loses her mind over Professor Karlan

posted 4 years ago by [deleted]
27 replies | jump to latest

On "FOX & FRIENDS" this morning, White House counselor Kellyanne Conartist continued attacking constitutional scholar, and T-rump impeaching hearing witness, Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan of 'looking down' on average Americans. Of course, Karlan never suggested anything of the kind, and Kellyanne had no proof.

Yet that didn't stop Kellyanne from letting her inferiority complex do the fuming...

“If you went to work today to manicure nails, to manicure lawn, if you went to work with a jackhammer, or a welding machine, or mechanics’ tools, or a carpentry belt… that woman yesterday looks her nose down on you, she thinks you are less than her!” Conway raged without providing any proof at all.

“I’ve had it! You know why that man ran for president in the first place, for the forgotten man and the forgotten woman, you know why I’m still in the White House? For you!”

Conartist continued her nonsensical blather by attacking Karlan for her "three Yale Law Degrees".... probably to show she supports the achievements of other professional women? Maybe not.

She wound down her attack on Professor Karlan when she concluded, “Who the hell are you, lady? You look down on half the country… she hobnobs with the elite!” , again offering no proof or evidence of her accusations.

#BeBestKellyanne! #BeBest!

For links, see 'FOX & FRIENDS', as they offer the whole embarrassing enchilada for you.

[–] NormaAndNorman (3900) 4 years ago

My question to you is, is Fox and Friends still talking about Christmas trees? I'm thinking about getting a new one but I'm not sure which one to buy? Do they suggest a real one, an artificial one...? If it's artificial what did they think about those pencil trees? I'm kinda tired of the big bulky tree in the big bulky box. Also, do they recommend clear lights or multi colored lights? Multi colored kind of went out of style years ago but if the lights are all one color, especially white, I wouldn't want my neighbors reading into that thinking I'm racist or something.
Just so much to consider.

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

They weren't talking about Christmas trees this morning - Kellyanne was too busy denigrating Professor Karlan for being a Yale educated, professional woman, with three law degrees, who is a constitutional scholar.

Poor Kellyanne and her inferiority complex - maybe she'd be happier if Karlan was a student at T-rump University? I guess that's where all those downtrodden lawn manicurists and welding machine workers she speaks of got their degrees from - the ones whom T-rump represents on a daily basis.

#BeBestKellyanne

[–] NormaAndNorman (3900) 4 years ago

That Karlan sure is a biased piece of work.

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

If that's how you see a law professor and recognized constitutional scholar, so be it. She still makes Kellyanne feel like a piece of shit on national television.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 4 years ago

First of all, Fox News thanks you for watching. It's because of viewers like you that keep Fox News the #1 rated cable news network!😁😁😁

Second, where's the link? Oh, yes. Not slanted enough. D'oh!🤪🤪🤪

Third, Thank the Lord, Buddha, Allah, Mother Earth, Vishnu, Yahweh, or whoever that this shrill shill didn't get into the Supreme Court. That quip about Baron Trump was pure cringe not to mention callous and spiteful. Such a non-partisan, yes?

Fourth, this "Professor" said she had to cross the street, when passing by the Trump Hotel. How stupidly superficial is that? What a joke and dolt she is. 🤪🤪🤪

Fifth, You sloughed through the whole proceedings live and then you STILL went to Fox News??? Pathetic.🤣🤣🤣

#PartisanShillDunce

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

1. They're welcome. So is MSNBC, as I watched "Morning Joe", as well.

2. See the very last sentence of my OP, or ask your special ed teacher to read it to you if you can't read more than a few sentences.

3. Please keep expressing your faux outrage over her pun about the name Barron. But laugh along with T-rump when he insults everyone who's against him.

4. I don't blame her. Knowing he's liable to come out onto Fifth Avenue and 'shoot someone' and his supporters would applaud, I wouldn't want to be a casualty. I'd rather stay far away from his property if I can - and if that means crossing the street to avoid his property, so be it.

5. Yes, I wanted to see Kellyanne's inferiority complex speak to the audience live in real time. You're right - she is pathetic.

#BeBestKellyanne

[–] NormaAndNorman (3900) 4 years ago

Morning Joe?!!! And you pick on people for watching Fox?! 😅

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

That is correct. It used to be T-rump's favorite morning TV show, too. Until they started reporting the truth on him - and he didn't like that. So he switched channels to "FOX & Friends", because they're "nice to him" and don't report the truth.

[–] ultravioletx (10216) 4 years ago

That's true. Trump would even discuss with Scarborough on air the possibility of Joe running as Trump's VP.

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

How quickly T-rumptards forget this, huh?

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 4 years ago

1. So you watch MSDNC too. How is that relevant? Is that an accomplishment or something? You want a cookie for that? 🤪🤪🤪

2. You're supposed to PASTE the link so people can directly click on it. You've done it before. Forgot already? Duuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....Stupid much? That's a rhetorical question. Just FYI.🤪🤪🤪

3. So you condone her callous and spiteful and POINTLESS attack at Trump's son who hasn't done or said a single thing in the political spectum? Another reason why you're a despicable wretched person that you are. Shamelessly despicable as well.🙄

4. A dunce statement coming from a dunce retard. Dimmer than burnt out lightbulb, aren't you dogdump? What else is new?🤪🤪🤪

5. Fox News thanks you for watching LIVE. Fox News thanks you for your CONTINUED SUBSCRIPTION. Fox News thanks you for making it THE #1 RATED CABLE NEWS NETWORK. This is proof you don't watch Fox News by proxy. You watch it DIRECTLY. D'oh!!! Liar much? Contradict much? Stupid much? Idiot much? 😁😁😆😆😂😂

[–] NormaAndNorman (3900) 4 years ago

He's impressed by this so-called "constitutional scholar" attacking a minor.

Speaks volumes.

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

From PBS:

At one point during Karlan’s testimony, she said that while President Donald Trump can “name his son Barron, he can’t make him a baron.” Karlan was trying to make a point that Trump is a president and not a king.

THAT'S AN ATTACK ON A MINOR CHILD ?

Locking kids up in cages and separating them from their parents is an attack on minor children. Using the name 'Barron' in this instance is not. Snowflake republicans need to get their faux outrage in order.

[–] NormaAndNorman (3900) 4 years ago

Ok Joy Behar.

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Faux outrage from the republicans as they lick their wounds from losing yesterday's battle.

[–] NormaAndNorman (3900) 4 years ago

No pain here. The whole thing is a sham.

[–] elcamino (15540) 4 years ago

LOst a stack court against them. But really they are saying they can try and get him as many times as they want.
House Democrat Gives the Game Away: 'No Limit to the Number of Times' We Will Try to Impeach Trump

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

House Democrat Gives the Game Away: 'No Limit to the Number of Times' We Will Try to Impeach Trump

Indeed! T-rump has racked up so many articles of impeachment since January 21, 2017 there are a number of ways to impeach him - yet all it takes is one article.

The House Democrats would not be serving their constituents if they did not impeach him. This is the oath of Office which they swore to - protecting our beloved country and her citizens.

Too bad Republicans aren't taking their oath as seriously - they should each resign for putting party before country and not doing the job they were sworn in to do.

[–] elcamino (15540) 4 years ago

Fashion Notes: Melania Trump Lights Christmas Tree Wrapped in Gabriela Hearst Trench Coat

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 4 years ago

Using a person's son as a prop to attack the father's character is a cheap shot. Again, it's callous, spiteful, but most of all POINTLESS. Yeah, she'd get her friends to giggle at her cringe inducing joke, but like all dems she FAILED to look at the big picture. It really shows what kind of despicable person she is. I understand why you gravitate towards her, dogdump. You both share a common trait.😍

So then Obama attacked minor children, yes? And where was the outrage then? Hypocrite much? Double standard much? Ignorant much? Contradict much? Dunce much? Despicable much? Those are all rhetorical. Just FYI. Stupid much? That one too. 🥴🥴🤪🤪

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Using a person's son as a prop to attack the father's character is a cheap shot. Again, it's callous, spiteful, but most of all POINTLESS.

Hardly.

It's faux outrage from the republicans to cover up the fact they were on the losing end pf the battle yesterday.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 4 years ago

Oh? So it's not a cheap shot? It's not callous or spiteful? It was definitely POINTLESS. Would you like to defend the point of the statement?

You know, being that you're so stupid and ugly and despicable, it must be attributed to upbringing but mostly heredity, yes? Was that a cheap shot? Callous? Spiteful? It can't be per you.🤪🤪🤪

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Oh? So it's not a cheap shot? It's not callous or spiteful? It was definitely POINTLESS. Would you like to defend the point of the statement?

It's transparent faux outrage.

What exactly did Karlan say that was so disparaging to his son? What was so hurtful? What was so shameful?

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 4 years ago

I told you already. Don't you know how to read? She used his son as prop to tell a cringy joke to jab the President.

If she did nothing wrong, so you say, why did she later apologize for "doing nothing wrong"?

Again, your mom gave birth to you and bestowed you with her intelligence. And you know what I think about your intelligence level, yes? 🤪🤪🤪

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

OK, so you can't explain the faux outrage - got it.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 4 years ago

Now you're just proving that you aren't too smart, dunce dogdump. What else is new?🤪🤪🤪

[–] slimone (7996) 4 years ago

I cannot stand Kelleyanne Conway!!! I wish she would go away, like Orange Head, ASAP!