He's exposing how EVERYBODY was in on the SECRET PLOT to SCREW OVER the UKRAINE !!!
Can hardly wait to see what happens now with the VP also exposed as being a part of the BRIBE that took place !!!
Looks like NANCY might end up being the NEXT POTUS if the GOP comes to their SENSES and VOTES to GET RID of the SCAM MAN during the IMPEACHMENT TRIAL !!!
Also looks like PENSE might also be named in the ARTICLES of IMPEACHMENT as well???
When questioned as to whether or not PENSE asked any QUESTIONS regarding what SONDLAND said about the UKRAINE situation, SONDLAND said NO HE DID NOT (which also indicates PENSE KNEW about what was going on).
Does anyone know if PENSE can also be IMPEACHED at the SAME TIME as the SCAM MAN???
Or would he need to have a SEPARATE IMPEACHMENT process to remove him from office???
DURING the 5 MIN BREAK MSNBC just described what happened as being what they call a
BLOWTORCH TESTIMONY !!!
What a WONDERFUL way to WORD what's just happened !!!
That LOUD MOUTH member of the GOP who's always having HISSY FITS (and replaced someone else) also looked kind of WORRIED when the CAMERA showed him sitting there right before everyone was leaving to take the BREAK.
He'll probably also still find a way to be a WHINEY LITTLE BITCH when the turn comes for the GOP to question SONDLAND though.
MSNBC also says the WHITE HOUSE is trying to DENY SONDLAND has thrown the SCAM MAN under the bus!!!
So that means RUDY's next up to get thrown UNDER it by the SCAM MAN (just like he previously threw COHEN UNDER IT and he now sits there in a JAIL CELL because of the SCAM MAN).
SCHIFF is also being INTERVIEWED now as well during the break.
WOW!!! SONDLAND is really giving the CRAP BACK to the ATTORNEY GUY that the GOP hired to ask him questions !!!
Like when he asked him something and SONDLAND SAID he wishes he had HIS NOTES (which are being HELD HOSTAGE by the SCAM MAN who refuses to RELEASE THEM) because then he could better remember what happened.
Then the ATTORNEY quickly changes the SUBJECT like he keeps doing because he knows the QUESTIONS he's asking are a bunch of BS.
One gets the impression SONDLAND's the COOL as a CUCUMBER ATTORNEY and this NERVOUS ATTY DUDE is the CRIMINAL.
The GUY in the PALE BLUE SHIRT had a BIG HISSY FIT just like one PREDICTED …
at one point SONDLAND also sat there and LAUGHED at him …
because he just IGNORES EVERYTHING SONDLAND already said and MAKES UP another STORY …
that contains words like PRESUMPTION or assumption
so they're right back to trying to say NO THIS FOR THAT ever TOOK PLACE
even though it's ABUNDANTLY CLEAR by NOW that a THIS FOR THAT situation most definitely DID TAKE PLACE...
due to the MANY, MANY WITNESSES that have come forth to give EYE WITNESS ACCOUNTS of what they HEARD the SCAM MAN saying on the CELL PHONE in the RESTAURANT in UKRAINE.
But NONE of this is going to matter ONE BIT when the IMPEACHMENT TRIAL begins ... because LOGIC will also be USED there instead of the IRRATIONAL kind of EMOTIONAL NONSENSE that the GOP is trying to USE now ... as a way to try and OBSCURE the FACT that the SCAM MAN is as GUILTY as HELL of the way that he BRIBED the LEADER of UKRAINE.
So even IF the GOP VOTES NOT GUILTY after the TRIAL, it will still also be CRYSTAL CLEAR that HE IS GUILTY of the IMPEACHMENT CRIMES (such as the ABUSE of POWER) that he's being accused of now.
Still Another WONDERFUL CLIP is when MALONEY FORCED SONDLAND into ADMITTING that THE SCAM MAN is the only person who had reason to WANT DIRT DUG UP on BIDEN.
Originally I'd come here to PRAISE HIM for what he'd done, but then forgot to do it because SCHIFF was giving the CLOSING ARGUMENT at that time and one was so IMPRESSED by what he said that one forgot to mention what MALONEY said to SONDLAND.
They all did a GREAT JOB today, but of course the GOP is also trying to say the HEARING was a DRAW when it was OBVIOUSLY a SLAM DUNK on the part of the DEMOCRATS.
Piece of his mind? Why? I thought his opening statement was damning? You meaning he has to add on to it to make his point that his opening statement was damning?
What is so damning anyway? He stated Trump said, "I don't want nothing. I want no quid pro quo. I want him to do the right thing." That's pretty damning, innit? The other congressman asked him, "You don't have any evidence other than your presumption." And he said yes. That's pretty damning, innit?
Now you and your komrades can circle jerk together and sit back and watch the inevitable happen, if you believe what you say, yes?
LOL! Once again, Trump takes out his Sharpie and tries to deny reality.
I suggest you actually watch or listen to the impeachment inquiry rather than propaganda. Sondland REPEATEDLY said there was a quid pro quo and was following Trump's orders. Sondland isn't going to prison for Trump by perjuring himself.
Actions speak louder than Trump the pathological liar's words (14,000+ lies to date.) Anyway, Trump was only reading from his own notes that he used in order to talk to reporters.
Sondland described Trump's actions as quid pro quo repeatedly and made it clear that they were all following his orders.
"Morrison and Volker, the witnesses who were supposed to be good for Republicans, also ended up confirming key parts of the case against Trump.
Vindman — also an Iraq War veteran with a Purple Heart — is very hard to dismiss as a left-wing Democratic plant."
"Even staunch Republicans predicted game over for Trump. “We now know that the president in fact committed the crime of bribery,” said Kenneth Starr, the prosecutor in the Bill Clinton impeachment. “I think articles of impeachment are being drawn up if they haven’t already been drawn up."
I asked because you are asking questions which would've been answered by watching the impeachment.
Could you tell me which witnesses' bits and pieces you watched live and then we can discuss from that point. I'd be happy to share my perspective with you, but I'd like us to compare from the same reference point.
BTW, second-hand info from biased commentators (dem. or rep.) giving their spin is useless which is why I wanted to l listen live. There's a big difference between forming your own opinion and just repeating their spin.
And I asked you specifically to see what you took in and what you ignored.
A little bit of everybody.
What you say is true. The only problem is that you've never displayed an iota of INDEPENDENT THOUGHT. Everything you say is ignorant groupthiink from your indoctrinated narrative of Orange Man Bad.