MovieChat Forums > Politics > Sondland is spilling all

Sondland is spilling all

posted 4 years ago by yatzo376 (7440)
26 replies | jump to latest

Says “yes” to a quid pro quo in Ukraine scandal

Awesome! I think donald is due another "check up". :)

[–] joi2049 (5488) 4 years ago

The NEXT TWEET he makes should definitely be an INTERESTING one !!!

Of course he'll probably call SOUNDLAND a LIAR and FIRE HIM like he did COMEY and try to SAY PENSE knew nothing.

[–] dteam6 (5073) 4 years ago

One would expect nothing less from the classless, bullying fat hog.

[–] joi2049 (5488) 4 years ago

During the 5 min BREAK they took MSNBC says the WHITE HOUSE is already trying to DENY SONDLAND threw THE SCAM MAN under the BUS …

and it looks like now the SCAM MAN is going to try to throw RUDY UNDER IT …

like he did COHEN

(who also now sits inside of a JAIL CELL because of what he did for the SCAM MAN).

So the next question is WHAT'S RUDY going to do???

Is he also going to EXPOSE the SCAM MAN or go to JAIL because of him???

My guess is he'll EXPOSE him due to the way he held up his CELL PHONE on TV and said it's ALL in THERE.

[–] dteam6 (5073) 4 years ago

Rudy could try to hold out for that "eventual" pardon (like that moron, Manafort, probably is) but we all know that Rudy could easily expose it by accident with how big a mouth he has.

[–] joi2049 (5488) 4 years ago

Would RUDY also be willing to WAIT in JAIL like MANAFORT did while he's being TRIED???

Somehow one can't see him willing to do something like that, especially after the way he was also doing what he did as a way TO MAKE MONEY for himself.

PLUS isn't it also NEW YORK who is investigating him (which also means he's NOT going to be under the JURISDICTION of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT ...

if and whenever he is CHARGED with the CRIMES that he's being investigated for ...

(which is not registering as working for a FOREIGN GOVERNMENT ... which is also the SAME kind of CRIME as the others who worked for THE SCAM MAN were charged with)???

In other words, being TRIED by NEW YORK (the SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NY) also means that the SCAM MAN CANNOT PARDON him.

Because he can only PARDON FEDERAL CRIMES (not STATE CRIMES).

[–] dteam6 (5073) 4 years ago

We're in uncharted waters here, far as I can see it. Rudy has an unusual connection with Trump and has thrown himself on the sword for donald more than once.

Donald never bad-mouths Rudy in public like he does the other associates. Ever. These two are unusually loyal to each other. Perhaps they have dirt on each other.

If some sort of immunity was offered, I guess I could see Rudy folding. He IS a weasel, after all. But, I'd say it's clear that both men have SOMETHING on each other.

[–] LordBAElish (2015) 4 years ago

Sondland: "I've never heard from President Trump that the aid was conditioned on the investigations." He reached this conclusion on his own.

So, in short, yet another witness who can't testify to the Democrats' accusations.

[–] elcamino (15540) 4 years ago

Is spilling all the bad mindreading he can come up with. That doesn't change a republican vote though.

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Mindreading? where did you get that one from? Hannity or Pirro?

[–] dteam6 (5073) 4 years ago

The clowns on this board are getting extra...stupid with their posts lately. I miss IMDB. Could you even imagine how great the troll entertainment would have been? These guys don't even qualify as lightweights.

[–] elcamino (15540) 4 years ago

This was telepathy he can do that also.
Sondland said in his opening statement that he brought up the issue during a Sept. 1 meeting with Pence in Warsaw. However, Short denied the exchange ever took place.

“Multiple witnesses have testified under oath that Vice President Pence never raised Hunter Biden, former Vice President Joe Biden, Crowdstrike, Burisma, or investigations in any conversation with Ukrainians or President Zelensky before, during, or after the September 1 meeting in Poland," Short said.

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Sorry kid. I really can't follow anything you're saying on this one. Mindreading and telepathy? Is this the new defense for T-rump?

[–] elcamino (15540) 4 years ago

Sondland saying he talked to Pence. Pence says he never has. I think the conversation is in Pences subconscious area. Maybe hypnosis thing will bring it out.

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Pence has been proven to be lying by more than one witness.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 4 years ago

You mean like how Schiff lied about never speaking to the whistleblower? Got it! 🤪

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

You mean this whistle-blower?

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-trump-impeachment-whistleblower/whistleblower-never-met-or-talked-with-schiff-source-idUSKBN1XN2O5

Got it!

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 4 years ago

This one.

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/464374-washington-post-fact-checker-gives-schiff-four-pinocchios-for-whistleblower

WaPo is credible in your eyes, yes?

Speaking of eyes, have you set your eyes on Alice the Fairy today? I found out that your komrade dteam is also despicable like you and tee-hees like a fairy like you. You two can read it together and tee-hee together. Doesn't that sound like fun?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TA0GYgmDx94

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

I'm going to go with 'the source familiar with the whistleblower’s contacts with investigators' who said allegations that Schiff met or had any other contact with the whistleblower were “completely false.”

The source, at this point, is most credible in my eyes.

How about yours?

I know this is all too much for you to handle, so I suggest you go back to "Alice the Fairy" which you seem to enjoy so much, you recommend it in every post. I believe that's the safe space for you, where you don't feel threatened by the testimony from Sondland.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 4 years ago

If you believe Schiff doesn't know who the whistleblower is and Vindman, under oath, said he doesn't know who the whistleblower is, then why did Schiff stop the questioning to PROTECT THE WHISTLEBLOWER? If you don't know who the person is, how can you PROTECT somebody who is unknown? It's only obvious, dunce.

Ignorant much? What else is new, dogdump?

Speaking of dunce, dunceteam likes to tee-hee like a fairy as well! You now have a tee-hee buddy so I recommend you both view Alice the Fairy together. You can take turns turning the page and tee-heeing to the anticipation. Nothing is better than having a friend to share Alice the Fairy with!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TA0GYgmDx94

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Again, "Alice the Fairy" is more your speed. This is beyond your comprehension.

Maybe Sean Hannity can read it to you?

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 4 years ago

Your omission in your response is your Ignorance to the truth. If only you can actually believe the chepooka you spew. Indoctrinated much, despicable dogdump?

Speaking of indoctrinated, the despicable dteam also needs some Alice the Fairy. Speaking of despicable, you're both despicable and can use some Alice the Fairy in your life. Head on over for a read aloud version right now and tee-hee like a fairy together! Should be loads of fun!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TA0GYgmDx94

[–] [deleted] 4 years ago

Your omission in your response is your Ignorance to the truth.

OK, thanks for that! I wasn't sure what it was, but you seemed to clear it up for me. I'll sleep better tonight.

[–] Sandman27 (3043) 4 years ago

I'm here to help.

Speaking of help, did you help yourself to a helping of Alice the Fairy? No? Then go grab your komrade and huddle close together for tee-hee good time. Afterwards, you both can act out the story tee-heeing like fairies. I told you it's the perfect book.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TA0GYgmDx94

[–] chilone (17251) 4 years ago

That's rich coming from you, a PROVEN LIAR!

[–] elcamino (15540) 4 years ago