The SCAM MAN is busy TWEETING this morning and is BAD MOUTHING MARIE as she sits there and TESTIFIES for CONGRESS today.
As a result, the CHAIRMAN also read what the SCAM MAN said about her, and then CONCLUDES by pointing out how what he's doing is INTIMIDATING a WITNESS.
So can we also look forward to this as being one of the ARTICLES of IMPEACHMENT???
During the BREAK that CONGRESS is taking MSNBC is now discussing the WAY that the SCAM MAN tried to TAMPER with the WITNESS while they were TESTIFYING.
A former AMBASSADOR to RUSSIA is being interviewed and he's definitely UPSET.
Ooooooo! mur-DUR!!! I'm sure this will get T-rump the electric chair!!
shareOrange Man in the White House...tweets some stuff...Schiff's in Congress and looks in for the sign and is set...he checks the Orange Man and here's the pitch...Taylor swing and a miss strike three! And that's the ball game!
Pray continue with the play by play! You're no Vin Scully, but he only did baseball.😂
MSNBC also interviewed other CONGRESSMEN and they also discussed how TAMPERING with a WITNESS is also what's called:
CONSCIOUSNESS of GUILT.
Because if someone is innocent, then they'd also have NO REASON to try to INTIMIDATE a WITNESS the way the SCAM MAN keeps doing.
Imo, TWITTER should also CANCEL his ACCOUNT because if one of us were to do something like this we'd most likely also have our account SHUT DOWN.
Grasping. At. Straws.
shareThe Twitter Rules
https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules
SafetyPrivacyAuthenticityEnforcement and AppealsThird-Party Advertising in Video Content
Violence: You may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people. We also prohibit the glorification of violence. Learn more about our violent threat and glorification of violence policies. Terrorism/violent extremism: You may not threaten or promote terrorism or violent extremism. Learn more.Child sexual exploitation: We have zero tolerance for child sexual exploitation on Twitter. Learn more.Abuse/harassment: You may not engage in the targeted harassment of someone[/b], …
OBVIOUSLY the SCAM MAN was making MARIE a TARGET of his HARASSMENT when he made the TWEET.
And when he said BAD THINGS would happen to her if she didn't leave the UKRAINE, that was also a THREAT of VIOLENCE against her
(same way as the PORN STAR he screwed was also THREATENED when some THUG told her it would be a SHAME if her INFANT DAUGHTER she was putting into the BACK SEAT of her car ended up without a MOTHER if the PORN STAR didn't keep her mouth shut about having had SEX with the SCAM MAN (who was also a MARRIED MAN with a WIFE who'd also recently given birth to his 5th child).
[b]The SCAM MAN THREATENED the PORN STAR ...
He THREATENS the AMBASSADOR ...
which are also the SAME kind of THUG like TACTICS that PUTIN himself uses to INTIMIDATE people.
We'd not only have our Twitter shut down, we'd be behind bars.
shareIt's also harassment. I hated the idea of Kamala Harris' campaign to get Trump kicked from Twitter but I wouldn't be surprised if Twitter does it on their own at this point.
shareThe reason why they won't is because he'd stand on the FRONT LAWN of the WHITE HOUSE BAD MOUTHING TWITTER to the PRESS and telling all his CULT MEMBERS to DELETE their TWITTER ACCOUNTS.
Because He's also already attacked AMAZON and other companies.
PLUS we'd also have no RECORD of what he does or how he FEELS about something anymore, because we also already know how he's HIDDEN what he does (the phone call with UKRAINE) by putting info on TOP SECRET SERVERS where it doesn't belong.
So for HISTORY to know what a CROOKED SLEAZY SCAM MAN he is, the TWEETS will come in handy in that regard.
And besides for the press conferences he could also do FIRESIDE CHATS or start a BLOG or use FACE BOOK as well as a way to VENT the way he feels. And he's also got those STUPID RALLIES too.
The reason why they won't is because he'd stand on the FRONT LAWN of the WHITE HOUSE BAD MOUTHING TWITTER to the PRESS and telling all his CULT MEMBERS to DELETE their TWITTER ACCOUNTS.
I agree …
but how likely is it TWITTER is going to RISK PISSING off the SCAM MAN by shutting down his ability to TWEET …
when they also know he'd have another HISSY FIT and BAD MOUTH them and try to RUIN them???
On MSNBC they also said he'd TWEETED something like 100 TIMES on Wednesday and some other outrageous amount today, and that since last MONTH he'd TWEETED OVER 1,000 TIMES.
So anyone in their RIGHT MIND isn't going to READ all of the CRAP that he says anyhow.
People with any sense would have LONG AGO stopped paying any attention to him and even more people (like myself) only know what he says because someone on the NEWS happens to mention something he's said.
On CNN they were just talking about how the SCAM MAN TALKED so LOUD on the CELL PHONE that SONDLAND had to hold the PHONE AWAY from his EAR.
So now we also know he didn't have it on SPEAKER PHONE and the reason why others could HEAR HIM.
The IDIOT is probably also going DEAF and needs to have his HEARING CHECKED and get a HEARING AID.
But he's too busy WRITING FAKE LETTERS for DOCTORS that claim he's in PERFECT HEALTH.
What EXACTLY did the President tweet that violates twitter? Post it and prove it. If you can't, then you're getting red in the face for nothing.
The Twitter Rules
https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules
SafetyPrivacyAuthenticityEnforcement and AppealsThird-Party Advertising in Video Content
Violence: You may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people. We also prohibit the glorification of violence. Learn more about our violent threat and glorification of violence policies. Terrorism/violent extremism: You may not threaten or promote terrorism or violent extremism. Learn more.Child sexual exploitation: We have zero tolerance for child sexual exploitation on Twitter. Learn more.Abuse/harassment: You may not engage in the targeted harassment of someone[/b], …
OBVIOUSLY the SCAM MAN was making MARIE a TARGET of his HARASSMENT when he made the TWEET.
And when he said BAD THINGS would happen to her if she didn't leave the UKRAINE, that was also a THREAT of VIOLENCE against her
(same way as the PORN STAR he screwed was also THREATENED when some THUG told her it would be a SHAME if her INFANT DAUGHTER she was putting into the BACK SEAT of her car ended up without a MOTHER if the PORN STAR didn't keep her mouth shut about having had SEX with the SCAM MAN (who was also a MARRIED MAN with a WIFE who'd also recently given birth to his 5th child).
[b]The SCAM MAN THREATENED the PORN STAR ...
He THREATENS the AMBASSADOR ...
which are also the SAME kind of THUG like TACTICS that PUTIN himself uses to INTIMIDATE people.
What did the President tweet EXACTLY? POST THE TWEET. This way we can review together to see if its in violation.
shareThe SCAM MAN is busy TWEETING this morning and is BAD MOUTHING MARIE as she sits there and TESTIFIES for CONGRESS today.
As a result, the CHAIRMAN also read what the SCAM MAN said about her, and then CONCLUDES by pointing out how what he's doing is INTIMIDATING a WITNESS. .
So can we also look forward to this as being one of the ARTICLES of IMPEACHMENT???
YOU'VE GOT NOTHING TO SAY. YOU KEEP ON PASTING THE SAME CHEPOOKA OVER AND OVER AGAIN IN BOLD CAPS.
WHY IS IT SO HARD TO POST THE EXACT TWEET AND SEE IF IT VIOLATES TWITTERS RULE? IS IT BECAUSE IT DOESN'T VIOLATE IT AND YOU JUST WISH IT DID?
PATHETIC.
YOU CAN READ the TWEETS at this link:
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/witness-intimidation-in-real-time-schiff-and-yovanovitch-respond-to-trump-moments-after-he-launches-twitter-attacks/
QUOTE:
Former Ukraine ambassador Marie Yovanovitch was asked to react to President Donald Trump’s online attacks as she testified before the impeachment inquiry.
Daniel Goldman, the counsel for House Democrats, had been asking the ousted ambassador about the president’s threats and smear campaign against her, and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) paused the testimony to read aloud the tweets Trump had sent out just minutes earlier.
(The TWEETS he reads are INSERTED here at this point)
“I don’t think I have such powers not in Mogadishu and Somalia and not in other places,” Yovanovitch testified. “I actually think that where I’ve served over the years, I and others have demonstrably made things better, you know, for the U.S., as well as for the countries that I’ve served in. Ukraine, for example, where there are huge challenges including, you know, on the issue that we’re discussing today of corruption, huge challenges, but they have made a lot of progress since 2014 including in the years that I was there, and I think, in part, I, meaning the Ukrainian people get the most credit for that because apart of that credit goes to the United States and to me as the Ambassador because — in Ukraine.”
“Some of us here take witness intimidation very, very seriously,” Schiff said, and then sought evidence that the president had indeed committed a crime with his tweets. “It’s designed to intimidate, is it not?”
Okay. So what part of the tweet do you think is in violation of twitter? Try to be succinct.
shareQUOTES:
There's a lot of talk that this will be one of the articles of impeachment. Gym Jordan must be going nuts trying to defend T-rump at this point.
“Some of us here take witness intimidation very, very seriously,” Schiff said, and then sought evidence that the president had indeed committed a crime with his tweets. “It’s designed to intimidate, is it not?”
END QUOTES
Since I'm just a messenger who conveys a message, You need to address your QUESTIONS to the CHAIRMAN and/or to others who know more about the matter.
Or write to someone at TWITTER or ask someone who has a TWITTER account (which I do not). But since the CHAIRMAN said "Some of us here take witness intimidation very, very seriously" and TWITTER RULES say HARASSMENT isn't allowed, and INTIMIDATION would also seem to be a form of HARASSMENT, one assumes the RULES have been broken that one agrees to abide by whenever one opens a TWITTER account.
And since the article also says "Daniel Goldman, the counsel for House Democrats, had been asking the ousted ambassador about the president’s threats and smear campaign against her" prior to the time when the CHAIRMAN breaks in to announce the TWEETS the SCAM MAN posted (where he continues with his SMEAR CAMPAIGN against her), one would also assume that's why it would also be considered as a form of ongoing harassment.
And if you don't see a connection, then there's also really nothing more that one can say to you to help you to see the connection.
What part of SUCCINCT did you fail to understand?
Where is the answer to my question? The only thing I see is the same post pasted over and over again.
In case you're not AWARE of this …
THIS IS MY TOPIC
NOT YOUR TOPIC
therefore if you want to BULLY someone into DISCUSSING things the way that YOU WANT TO ...
why not go START YOUR OWN TOPIC instead of BEING RUDE an INSISTING that someone else DISCUSS things ON THEIR TOPIC the WAY that YOU WANT them to???
FYI: Being SUCCINCT isn't a PART of my NATURE.
Whereas OTHERS may RUN like SHEEPS to their PENS, I DO NOT.
I'm NOT WIRED that way, and NOTHING you do or say is ever going TO CHANGE that.
For anyone else interested in the lastest news …
MSNBC now says there were 4 PEOPLE sitting at the TABLE in the RESTAURANT with HOLMES ( who also HEARD the SCAM MAN talking to SONDLAND on the CELL PHONE in the UKRAINE).
Thus also giving us at least 4 FIRST HAND WITNESS ACCOUNTS of how the SCAM MAN BRIBED the leader of UKRAINE.
I'm TRYING to discuss your "TOPIC", but you are so poor in communicating your point without adding a ton of SUPERFLUOUS junk.
Being succinct is not in your nature? Well that's an understatement. Maybe you should work on that, huh?
You don't listen. You're a person just waiting to talk. People can't have conversations with you because all you do is talk over people. These are signs of being close-minded, insecurity and ignorance. You should work on these things.
YOU KEEP DISCUSSING ME.
I AM NOT the SUBJECT of this TOPIC.
THIS is the SUBJECT:
SCHIFF just called out the SCAM MAN for WITNESS INTIMIDATION
So instead of being concerned ABOUT ME …
GO take your OWN ADVICE, take a look in the MIRROR, and do some much needed WORK on YOURSELF.
Okay. I'm looking in the mirror. Damn, I'm good looking!
MUCH MORE SUCCINCT THIS TIME. BRAVO!
IF SCHIFF DOESN'T READ THE TWEET LIVE, SHE DOESN'T KNOW ABOUT IT UNTIL AFTER, YES. SO HOW WOULD IT BEEN INTIMIDATION IF SCHIFF DOESN'T READ IT? PRAY TELL?
Hopefully this is SUCCINCT enough for you:
The reason for the SMEAR TACTIC against MARIE is the SCAM MAN is JEALOUS because she is EVERYTHING that the SCAM MAN IS NOT.
She's a DECENT, HONEST, HUMAN BEING.
He's a SLEAZY DISHONEST CROOK.
And the TWEETs where he BAD MOUTHS her were nothing but an ATTEMPT to try to make her look the way that HE IS HIMSELF.
EVERYTHING YOU SAID IS COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT TO THE HEARING.
ALL YOU'VE SAID IS ORANGE MAN BAD.
Wow, you cannot possibly be this dense, it has to be a bit...
shareHi Dick Dick! I'm sorry my post doesn't ascribe to the narrative of Orange Man Bad.
However, since a dunce like you has taken time out of your reach around time, which I'm flattered by the way, by all means, take up the mantle on this one for joi.
How would it be witness intimidation, if the Ambassador would've never seen them during her testimony?
[deleted]
I understand that your reach around time is too valuable to you, thus you can't take the time to do anything else, but only you can help yourself. Just FYI.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2vkiLHiTcY
There's a lot of talk that this will be one of the articles of impeachment. Gym Jordan must be going nuts trying to defend T-rump at this point.
shareEven Faux News can't deny the reality of the situation...
https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/it-is-a-crime-foxs-bret-baier-stunned-that-trump-just-added-an-article-of-impeachment-in-real-time/