MovieChat Forums > Politics > The psychology of Climate Change Denial

The psychology of Climate Change Denial


https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/denying-the-grave/201901/climate-change-denial

"As monumental hurricanes lash out in Houston and Puerto Rico and California forests burn out of control, it would seem that the evidence that climate scientists are right would be clear enough. Almost annually meteorologists tell us we have just experienced the warmest year in recorded history. Yet even people who experience extreme weather events often still refuse to report the experience as a manifestation of climate change...Others deny that climate change is either occurring at all or that it represents any significant threat to civilization."

"One reason for the refusal to accept the reality of climate change is what is called “motivated interference,” which occurs when we hold a specific bias to ignore evidence.

In other words, coal miners aren't likely to support the evidence for climate change and are inclined to say Trump is right about Windmill cancer. Lol

"Corporations, especially the fossil fuel industry, have spent huge sums attempting to obfuscate the reality of climate change. We are constantly told by them that “more data are needed” because “climate scientists don’t agree.” While no scientist would ever disagree with a call for more research—that line is, after all, found near the end of almost every scientific paper ever written—it just is not true that scientists don’t agree that climate change is real. To some extent, then, we are the victims of a well-funded and sophisticated misinformation campaign that attempts to keep us in the dark about climate change."

And the article goes on to talk about why people feel overwhelmed by the crisis and that is a factor.
This is just an article from Psychology Today but you can find a lot of people questioning the idiocy of debating whether climate change is real at this point.
It's pretty much like talking to flat earthers. They just don't get it. They don't want to get it. And if they get the slightest leverage by getting a stooge like Trump into office, then they have a powerful advocate to push the crackpot thinking and junk science into public debates.

Someday, trump won't be in office. And someone with sense will address the climate crisis. It's just a shame we have to wait for this buffoon to pass out of favor with voters in 2020.

reply

I don't understand climate change deniers at all. With all the evidence of the changes deniers should take notice. Fires, floods, hurricanes all over the world, melting glaciers, etc. it's hard to deny, but with a moron like Orange Head who skipped the Climate Change meeting at the G7 summit the Trumpistas and other deniers will someday be in deep regret.

reply

Thankfully, most people understand what is happening.
Like I said, a powerful advocate can give bad ideas a grande stage and make it harder to kill off the lame opposing views. It's funny that even businesses like Exxon look at his proposals and say, "this isn't even good business."

reply

The thing I don't get about climate change deniers is; okay, let's say global warming is, in fact, NOT real, and it's all completely natural and would happen the same way with or without our involvement. The world is expected to be near uninhabitable by 2150, but it's natural. So, we just sit around and wait to die? Just because it's natural, that means we shouldn't do anything to try and prevent this from happening? When we're having 90 degree F winters and the equatorial region is practically uninhabitable due to extreme heat, we should just shrug and let it happen? We shouldn't try to better the environment or make things right for the next generations?

If we discovered an asteroid the size of Oklahoma was hurling towards earth but wouldn't collide for 72 years, with several decades to prepare and plan our survival, would we just sit around and go "oh well, it's a natural occurrence, we can't do nothin about it but wait 72 years until it hits us!"

Whether global warming is real or not, it blows my mind that deniers want to watch the world incinerate because it's a "natural event" and not do anything to stop or slow it down. Quite pathetic that all this arrogance comes from a fact a liberal coined the term 'global warming', and them southern red boys dont wanna agree with no libtard.

reply

There is a religious component for some people. The idea that it's all "in God's hands."
The conservative attitude toward Israel sort of fits with this too. If you believe Armageddon is right around the corner, and God has a plan that involves Israel becoming a country and THEN getting attacked by the anti-Christ, then it's a pretty small leap to say that global warming isn't a major concern.
These people are betting everyone's futures on a fundamentalist understanding of old religious texts written by tribal people who thought the earth was flat.... so that kind of explains why flat earthers are still a thing too.
I think some of the climate deniers aren't religious though.
I think you are basically right that these people are so conditioned to hate anything liberal that any position they perceive as "leftist" is anathema. It's just a closed off world view.
To take your allegory about a meteor. They just wouldn't believe it was there...and they'd sit in their homes and listen to conservative media up until impact.

reply

"Someday, trump won't be in office. And someone with sense will address the climate crisis."

That's cute.

reply