Literal gold mine with collusion, great polls, coughing fits, and the whole shebang.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_IR90FthXQ < - Pollsters which he later fired; collusion avoidance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nf_CATbYilQ < - Showing his crib
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O2nkQMZEI6Q < - Collusion, coughing exclusion
I saw some of it (the greatest shits, as it were). I especially liked the part in the limo where Trumpie claimed to have "read" the Mueller report and tried to strongarm George that it absolutely exonerated him of collusion and obstruction. I think Trump only agrees to interviews with Stephanopoulos because he thinks he gets away with being a blowhard and he's too stupid to realize how much he keeps putting his foot in his mouth.
shareTrump doesn't know how to read. This video proves it.
https://youtu.be/KXGuJlTVXfw
The best part was how he insisted he read the Mueller Report (even when everyone knows that's laughable since the man doesn't read) which means the claim could be used against him in the future if he ever wanted to argue that he didn’t know what the law was.
It would have been smart for him to concede he hadn’t read it so he could claim ignorance in the face of any FEC violation which requires the subject KNOWS they are violating the law.
But of course we already know Trump's not smart. He intimidates far more intelligent opponents into feckless silence (ahem Mueller, Pelosi, all Republicans in congress except Amash) with the raw savagery of his blunt tweets. They're all pathetic.
The best part was how he insisted he read the Mueller Report (even when everyone knows that's laughable since the man doesn't read)
One more example of the left's strident and utterly fallacious "appeal to consensus".
Trust me, you will never speak for "everyone" - never.
You're right, I should have made the exception that everyone except *you* knows this. It's been reported enough times that anyone even remotely clued into the facts is aware of this.
He even openly admits it to the press "I like bullets or I like as little as possible."
https://www.axios.com/trump-doesnt-read-his-presidential-briefings-report-1518192747-64a340a0-83dc-43ab-a749-391b48af475e.html
It's why his briefers have resorted to oral and visual presentations.
Please tell me that every other President and politician doesn't rely on the same briefing bullet item summaries?
Do you think Obozo read every word of every document in play?
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2013/11/barack_obama_low_information_president.html
Obama has never had the survivors of the Benghazi Consulate terrorist attack to the White House. He has not hosted the family members of the four Americans killed in the line of duty. He has not had the families of those killed by his Fast & Furious "gun walking" program.
Obama went to sleep while the ambassador he sent to Libya, Chris Stevens, was enduring gunfire and dying in Benghazi, Libya. Why couldn't anyone get a hold of him? Where was Obama -- really?
Obama tells us he didn't know anything about the National Security Agency spying on the leaders of countries we are friends with. He didn't know about NSA spying on Americans. He didn't know about the IRS persecuting conservatives, led by the staff of the IRS General Counsel he appointed.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2775047/Report-White-House-intelligence-gap-Obama-skipping-FOUR-seven-daily-briefings.html
Report from the Government Accountability Institute examined the president's public calendar every day since his first inauguration
He has skipped most of his briefings, attending just 42.1 per cent of them in person
Daily briefs can also be delivered to the president in writing, and he prefers to read them on his iPad
On Sunday Obama blamed his Director of National Intelligence for failing to foresee the rise of the ISIS terror army in Iraq and Syria...
Actually your criticism of Obama only makes Trump look worse seeing as how much they had to simplify things for him compared to his predecessor:
When Donald Trump was elected president, it quickly became obvious that the traditional national-security briefing a person in his position receives daily would be well beyond his zone of proximal development. The briefings were slimmed down in length, chopped up into easy-to-digest bullet points, and decorated with lots of graphs and pictures. Alas, the Washington Post reports, even the kiddie version of the presidential brief has proven too challenging. Now, Trump gets his briefing verbally.
Trump, the Post reports, “has opted to rely on an oral briefing of select intelligence issues” because reading the brief — which every president has been able to do since its existence began — “is not Trump’s preferred ‘style of learning,’ according to a person with knowledge of the situation.”
Also, Trump does not receive his verbal briefing daily, but instead “about every two to three days on average in recent months, typically around 11 a.m.” That’s when “executive time” ends and Trump has to turn off Fox News to listen to officials for a while, before he gets more screen time later in the day.
He has an entire swamp to drain, all Obummer had to do was run status quo and add more alligators.
As evidence that he most clearly hasn't been sitting on his hands here's a list of accomplishments - more done in 2 years than the Trojan Horse could have imagined in a lifetime of tearing our Republic apart:
http://www.magapill.com
You see any indications of sloth or "dumbing down" in that list?
" Trump signs new defense policy bill that rebuilds military, boosts troop pay
Top 5 ISIS Leaders Captured
Trump signs order to keep Guantanamo Bay prison open
US kills 150 ISIS terrorists in Syria airstrike during government shutdown
ISIS has lost 98 percent of its territory - due to Trump admin
Pentagon Announces First-Ever Audit of the Department of Defense
U.S.-Backed Forces Capture Raqqa from ISIS
ISIS facing imminent collapse in Syria's Raqqa
Gen. Mattis breaks down New Afghanistan Strategy
US-backed fighters 'seize 80% of Raqqa from Islamic State'
Mattis sees need for new DOD space programs
Trump calls for Increased Military: Senate passes $700 billion defense bill
Mattis seeks Indian role in Afghanistan
Mattis vows US support for Ukraine against Russian 'aggression'
U.S. Cyber Command will be elevated to a "Unified Combatant Command"
Mattis decides to withhold U.S. cash from key Pakistani military fund
Mosul liberated from ISIS
Mattis: 'Annihilation Tactics' Being Used Against ISIS
US, Gulf countries form new group: 'TFTC' to stem flow of terror financing
NATO weighs new 'Counter Terrorism Post' following Trump's demands
ISIS leader 'admits DEFEAT in Iraq and orders militants to flee
Mattis Gives White House Tentative Plan for Rapid Defeat of ISIS
James Mattis threatens to ‘moderate’ US backing for Nato over budgets"
Actually your cut and paste laundry list serves to undermine your point and confirm mine.
It's a well known fact that after Trump took office he granted his military commanders the autonomy to make their own decisions instead of micromanaging every decision like Obama did. That was to give himself less work and responsibilities while providing convenient scapegoats if anything went wrong.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/us/politics/rules-of-engagement-military-force-mattis.html
"You see any indications of sloth or "dumbing down" in that list?"
Why absolutely yes. All of it because it wasn't him doing it. I note how many times you cite Mattis doing yeoman's work. Not Trump. Thanks for affirming my point.
Actually your cut and paste laundry list serves to undermine your point and confirm mine.
It's a well known fact that after Trump took office he granted his military commanders the autonomy to make their own decisions instead of micromanaging every decision like Obama did.
"as the former CEO of a major development firm he KNOWS the value of delegating"
Oh, that former CEO that ran six businesses into bankruptcy? Was that because he knew the value of delegating to the "best people"? It's funny you think six bankruptcies proves he knows the value of anything except scamming banks to loan him money that he's not credit worthy of borrowing.
But the art of the con is a skill and he apparently has it. I assume it's why you remain impressed with a guy who reported 1.2 billion in losses over a decade.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/05/07/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html
But then again, coming from a guy who admitted you found property management complicated and too expensive to maintain, I can see why you'd be easily impressed. So you'll just have to trust me when I tell you that losing that kind of dough isn't impressive. What is impressive is his con artist skills.
6 out of roughly 500 business ventures, oh well. Now let's just ask, what was the overall result of those bankruptcies, was it....a vibrant multi billion dollar development firm? Yes, yes it was.
As for total dollar losses, do cry us a fucking urn of crocodile tears for our national debt which is non-repayable in anyone's lifetimes here. Our bi-partisan SWAMP debt! To Yuro banksters!
What is impressive is his con artist skills.
"6 out of roughly 500 business ventures"
LMAO! You're still peddling this absurd canard? He had nothing to do with management of those "500 business ventures". His involvement was restricted to licensing deals where in exchange for the use of his name to brand the venture he was given a minority and non-controlling equity stake in the company.
Like I said, he's a master con artist. But the fact remains that every business he managed himself he ended up driving into insolvency. He was forced by the board of directors and creditors of those companies he bankrupted to give up his managing and controlling stake.
It takes a special kind of gross incompetence to bankrupt a casino. Just sayin.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/donald-trumps-business-failures-were-very-real
All of this was known before he was even elected. You got duped.
"6 out of roughly 500 business ventures"
LMAO! You're still peddling this absurd canard?
This is what I said in my previous post:
"Like I said, he's a master con artist. But the fact remains that every business he managed himself he ended up driving into insolvency. He was forced by the board of directors and creditors of those companies he bankrupted to give up his managing and controlling stake."
Thanks for confirming my point with your citations.
"Like I said, he's a master con artist.
I covered this already:
"His involvement was restricted to licensing deals where in exchange for the use of his name to brand the venture he was given a minority and non-controlling equity stake in the company."
I covered this already:
Yeah there are some core buildings he retained after restructuring from Chapter 11 that he built early in his career with daddy's money. But after the mass bankruptcies the buildings and development projects you'd see his name on were restricted to licensing deals he had no involvement in building himself. Look it up.
US banks wanted nothing to do with his money hemorrhaging management ineptitude. Look it up.
That was about the time when he shifted his money into golf courses.
Yeah there are some core buildings he retained after restructuring from Chapter 11 that he built early in his career with daddy's money.
lulz. Ok, you cited the ONE building Trump ORG developed recently in the DC hotel. All that dirty Russian money hard at work. 8}
shareI note how many times you cite Mattis [sic]who was doing yeoman's work. Not Trump. Thanks for affirming my point.
LOLOLOL!
https://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/donald-trump-f-35-cost-234719
Trump understands the maxim attributed to PT Barnum ... there really is a sucker born every minute. This is what happens when you don't fact check his claims to see if you've been lied to.
“This would’ve happened if Hillary Clinton had been elected president,” said Loren Thompson, a defense industry consultant who works for several top Pentagon contractors...
A source with direct knowledge of the negotiations, who was not authorized to speak publicly, said ..."
Good grief you'r easily gulled!
So who is this "Loren Thompson" one might ask and why does HIS commentary mean diddly, coming from an obvious Clintonista with a partisan agenda.
https://www.lexingtoninstitute.org/dr-loren-b-thompson/
Loren B. Thompson is Chief Operating Officer of the non-profit Lexington Institute and Chief Executive Officer of Source Associates, a for-profit consultancy. Prior to holding his present positions, he was Deputy Director of the Security Studies Program at Georgetown University and taught graduate-level courses in strategy, technology and media affairs at Georgetown. He has also taught at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government.
"Time for the Bush Military Build-up, Center for Security Policy, January 7, 2002"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexis_de_Tocqueville_Institution
The Alexis de Tocqueville Institution (AdTI) was a Washington, D.C.–based think tank.
It was named after the French historian Alexis de Tocqueville. Founded in 1988, its president was Ken Brown and its chairman was Gregory Fossedal. It had 14 staff researchers at its peak. It largely ceased operations in 2006. It issued its last press release in 2007 announcing that its former Chairman was running for President of the United States.
Pffft!!!!
Take your warhawk swamp creatures and go kill off some more of our human assets in your endless bankster pay for play, you statist oaf.
lolz. I love how you failed to refute a single fact in the article. That's because you couldn't since Politico fact checks their work before they publish.
Face it, you got duped.
lolz. I love how you failed to refute a single fact in the article.
LMAO! The price drop was already announced BEFORE Trump even took office from a price reduction blueprint in the works since 2014.
Face it, you got duped.
Indeed, Lt. Gen. Chris Bogdan, head of the F-35 Joint Program Office, told reporters in December that the price drop had already been planned for the 10th batch of F-35s. At the time, Bogdan pegged the price of each F-35A aircraft at 6 percent to 7 percent below the $102.1 million price tag in the previous contract — on par with the deal announced Friday.share
The price drop was already announced BEFORE Trump even took office [
Oh I'm dealing with the lulz just fine. I'm watching your denial when forced to swallow the red pill and I find it hilarious!
sharehttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/03/business/lockheed-lowers-price-on-f-35-fighters-after-prodding-by-trump.html
Feb. 3, 2017
After weeks of pressure from President Trump, Lockheed Martin agreed on Friday to a somewhat larger price cut on its F-35 fighters than it had on the last few orders, and finally brought the cost of the main version below $100 million for each jet.
You're good with Ye Old York Times, yes?
🤣
Check the dates. Days before the Politico article dropped. The Times got scooped and you got duped. 😉
shareCheck the dates. Days before the Politico article dropped. The Times got scooped
lolz! I love how you keep aping your hero by proving you're too lazy to read. Lt. Gen. Chris Bogdan isn't an "anonymous source". He told reporters on the record in December about the price drop. I even gave you the exact citation.
But again, I do love watching you magaheads forced to swallow the red pill. It's just so delicious. 😉
He told reporters on the record in December about the price drop.
Again:
Bogdan pegged the price of each F-35A aircraft at 6 percent to 7 percent below the $102.1 million price tag in the previous contract — on par with the deal announced Friday.
That's not what the NY Times and other "credible" news reports say.
It's also not what his Tweets prove.
Deal.
Again, check the dates.
shareTake your own advice.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/03/business/lockheed-lowers-price-on-f-35-fighters-after-prodding-by-trump.html
Feb. 3, 2017
After weeks of pressure from President Trump, Lockheed Martin agreed on Friday to a somewhat larger price cut on its F-35 fighters than it had on the last few orders, and finally brought the cost of the main version below $100 million for each jet.
Facts are facts. Bogdan announced to reporters the price drop in December of 2016 of F-35's by 6 percent to 7 percent below the $102.1 million price tag in the previous contract — on par with the deal announced.
This fact exposes everything else as Trump and Lockheed spin.
If the announced deal had come in greater than the 6 to 7 percent price drop you might have a point. But as the facts stand, you don't. The reality is Trump did nothing and you got duped.
This silliness and deceit must end now.
https://www.military.com/dodbuzz/2017/03/21/lockheed-ceo-trump-f-35-price-drop
21 Mar 2017
When President Donald Trump claimed at the end of January that his negotiations with Lockheed Martin executives were responsible for a $600 million savings in the most recent lot of 90 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters, critics were quick to point out that officials with the program had predicted the cost drop more than a month before.
But in a brief with reporters Tuesday, Lockheed CEO Marillyn Hewson said Trump was justified in taking credit for accelerating the deal-making on the F-35 lot and emphasizing a lower price point.
"If you think about his focus and his long-term trend of increasing more spending in national security and on defense spending, the F-35 is the largest program that the Department of Defense has in its budget," Hewson said. "So for him to focus on the F-35 and to focus on how he can get the best price for the taxpayer going forward, I think, was perfectly appropriate."
Trump's involvement in discussions on low-rate initial production (LRIP) lot 10, she said, had "absolutely" made a difference in the timing and outcome of the agreement between Lockheed and the Department of Defense on the aircraft buy.
"He helped accelerate that along, and I think he put a sharper focus on price and how we drive the price down," she said. "He absolutely did contribute to us getting to closure on that."
END OF STORY!
Again:
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), long a critic of the F-35's cost overruns and schedule delays, demanded in a January letter to Hewson details on "any new initiatives ... to reduce the F-35 program costs."
Trump's involvement in discussions on low-rate initial production (LRIP) lot 10, she said, had "absolutely" made a difference in the timing and outcome of the agreement between Lockheed and the Department of Defense on the aircraft buy.
"He helped accelerate that along, and I think he put a sharper focus on price and how we drive the price down," she said. "He absolutely did contribute to us getting to closure on that."
You still don't get that what she says is completely irrelevant to the fact that Gen Bogdan cited a 6-7% price drop to reporters in December 2016 before Trump took office and that's exactly in line with the final price drop. That proves Trump did nothing.
shareYou still don't get that what she says is completely irrelevant
It is completely irrelevant because Bogdan announced the price drop by 6-7% BEFORE Trump took office. This turned out to be in line with the final price.
Like I said, if the price dropped happened to be higher than 6-7% you might have a point. But it didn't. That means Trump did nothing.
It is completely irrelevant
You're still not getting that the FACT of Bogdan revealing the price drop and by how much which turned out to be accurate BEFORE Hewson said those things precludes what she's saying.
But you're right, her words are not irrelevant. They are relevant in light of the facts because the facts prove that she is lying.
But you're right, her words are not irrelevant. They are relevant in light of the facts because the facts prove that she is lying.
She's a liar because what she said is at odds with what Bogdan told the press previously. The fact that you can't see this is hilarious.
shareShe's a liar because what she said is at odds with what Bogdan told the press previously.
Bogdan's not a "leaker". Cope.
shareSure is.
shareNope. Read it again Sam. Bogdan tells the press on the record in December. Article never describes him as a leaker.
Cope.
Nope.
I love watching how triggered you are choking on that bitter red pill. 😉 Truth's gotta hurt.
shareCEO truth sure hurt you.
sharewhen you have to falsely call Bogdan a leaker to maintain your fiction, you're clearly
the butthurt one.
CEOs word is all that counts,period.
sharelolz! Were you born yesterday?
shareCEO's unambiguous statement on how the price was negotiated is all that matters.
shareWhat that final price she was claiming was compared to what Bogdan told the press is all that matters. They were on par, that's why we know she's lying and that you are so butthurt about it.
shareThis silliness and deceit must end now.
https://www.military.com/dodbuzz/2017/03/21/lockheed-ceo-trump-f-35-price-drop
21 Mar 2017
When President Donald Trump claimed at the end of January that his negotiations with Lockheed Martin executives were responsible for a $600 million savings in the most recent lot of 90 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters, critics were quick to point out that officials with the program had predicted the cost drop more than a month before.
But in a brief with reporters Tuesday, Lockheed CEO Marillyn Hewson said Trump was justified in taking credit for accelerating the deal-making on the F-35 lot and emphasizing a lower price point.
"If you think about his focus and his long-term trend of increasing more spending in national security and on defense spending, the F-35 is the largest program that the Department of Defense has in its budget," Hewson said. "So for him to focus on the F-35 and to focus on how he can get the best price for the taxpayer going forward, I think, was perfectly appropriate."
Trump's involvement in discussions on low-rate initial production (LRIP) lot 10, she said, had "absolutely" made a difference in the timing and outcome of the agreement between Lockheed and the Department of Defense on the aircraft buy.
"He helped accelerate that along, and I think he put a sharper focus on price and how we drive the price down," she said. "He absolutely did contribute to us getting to closure on that."
END OF STORY!
reply edit delete sha
Except he didn.t Read the Politico story again. It refutes yours.
shareNo flaming other members.
Thanks.
He even openly admits it to the press "I like bullets or I like as little as possible."
Like I said, the man doesn't read. You haven't said anything to disabuse anyone of this fact.
shareLike I said, he's done more than Obummer by a factor of ten and that stooge only made 42% of his briefings, cope.
shareWhat do you mean?
He sits on his fatass and watches Fox News and tweets all day. Everyone seems to know this but you.
And how is it that YOU allegedly know these "obvious" things?
First hand WH staff or kin to one are you?
No?
Bugger off.
Your manifest topical impotence causes me great mirth, mixed with utter revulsion.
I know because unlike you I stay informed. His private schedule was leaked to the press months ago and typically involves 5 hours a day of what's euphemistically labeled "Executive Time". This is the time he spends live tweeting Fox News and gabs on the phone with friends.
https://www.axios.com/donald-trump-private-schedules-leak-executive-time-34e67fbb-3af6-48df-aefb-52e02c334255.html
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/01/05/trump-media-feedback-loop-216248
But really, all you need to do is check the daily timestamps on his tweets to confirm this stuff yourself. Your boy king spends countless daily hours rage tweeting.
Like I've told you before, sometimes the truth really hurts.
I know because unlike you I stay informed. His private schedule was leaked to the press months ago and
Like I said, all you need to do is check the daily timestamps on his tweets to confirm this stuff yourself. Your boy king spends countless daily hours rage tweeting.
shareYour boy king spends countless daily hours rage tweeting.
"Amazing multitasking for man of his years, innit!"
lmao! Yeah, watching Fox and Friends and tweeting at the same time. The multitasking manchurian president. Just think. Five hours a day tweeting and gabbing on the phone with Hannity, begging him for the latest gossip. All before his 11:30 presidential briefing where he demands large bullet points and big flowery pictures in order to understand what they mean.
I love lolzing the airhead you worship. 😉
"Amazing multitasking for man of his years, innit!"
lmao! Yeah, watching Fox and Friends and tweeting at the same time.
I already shut you down last week on your same cut and paste of ICE stats. So I'll just cut and paste what I told you before.
Your stats just exhibits how Trump has been a colossal failure on his signature issue: immigration.
But now, as the effects of his immigration policies have become measurable, it is clear to us—three people who have worked on the issue in previous administrations—that Trump is the worst president for border security in the last 30 years.
The border is currently overwhelmed with increasing numbers of migrants, in particular Central American asylum seekers. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has reported that 66,450 persons were apprehended between the ports of entry in February, the highest monthly total in a decade. Projections for March are even worse—exceeding 100,000—with experts concerned that monthly totals could exceed 150,000 in the coming months. CBP is reassigning officers from the ports of entry, which are critically understaffed, to help Border Patrol with the crush. CBP Commissioner Kevin McAleenan has said the immigration system on the border is at “the breaking point.” In response, the president threatened to close the border altogether to legal crossings, a threat he walked back on Thursday and replaced with a “one-year warning” to Mexico.
Despite the administration’s attempts to shift blame for the chaos, make no mistake: It is Donald Trump himself who is responsible. Through misguided policies, political stunts and a failure of leadership, the president has created the conditions that allowed the asylum problem at the border to explode into a crisis.
Your stats just exhibits how Trump has been a colossal failure on his signature issue: immigration.
LOOOL! You're citing old articles when more recent data debunks your claims.
"The number of migrants apprehended at the border surged in May to the highest level since 2006, with 132,887 detained - including 11,507 unaccompanied children. It was the first time that detentions had exceeded 100,000 since April 2007."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44319094
That's a 13 year high. Worse than Obama.
I especially liked the part in the limo where Trumpie claimed to have "read" the Mueller report and tried to strongarm George that it absolutely exonerated him of collusion and obstruction.
They'll be plenty in 2011 when Rump is a private citizen again and he can't hid behind his "stay out of jail free" card--the Presidency.
shareIs this your concession that the Mueller report found NO collusion between him and the Russkies?
If so - good, it's about time.
The Mueller Report found plenty of instances of collusion between Trump and the Russians. The conclusion was although there was plenty of collusion, there wasn't enough evidence to warrant making a case of criminal conspiracy. JUST BECAUSE CHARGES ARE NOT BROUGHT DOESN'T MEAN A CRIME HAS NOT OCCURRED. If you'd read the report you'd see the facts prove Trump colluded with Russia. But that's probably too much judicial ambivalence for you to wrap yer wittle Trumpian pea-brain around.
As for Obstruction of Justice by Trump, if he wasn't sitting in the Oval Office and was any other person, there is overwhelming evidence it occurred. Hundreds of federal prosecutors across America have signed a letter stating so. Again, it's probably too complex for you to interpret what Mueller said concerning this: "...if we had clear evidence the President did not commit a crime, we would have so." That is NOT an exoneration, Chuckles.
The Mueller Report found plenty of instances of collusion between Trump and the Russians.
Read the report or GFY.
shareI did sweetness, now YOU POST THE CITATIONS - PAGE & VERSE!
Or stfu.
Screw you, numbnuts. If you actually DID read the report (but since you're a Trumptard, that's probably a lie), then obviously none of it sunk into your peabrain. My time is too precious to try and convince alt-right bozos like you of something you'll refuse to admit is the truth anyway.
shareIf your time were THAT precious you'd not be here flinging ad homs and making scurrilously inaccurate allegations.
Right?
🕸️
Very generous The President sat down with the head of the Clinton War Room. A group which cataloged their illegal campaign tactics in “The War Room” for all to see. Of course when demokkkrats spy and steal it’s just “good campaigning” and “oppo research”.
Wonder how George felt being the head of a campaign for a guy more concerned with bjs from 18yo linterns. A guy accused of rape by a half dozen women.
George seems like an intelligent, driven guy out for his own success. Just a regular old objective journalist concerned with providing the unbiased truth. He’s head of ABC news, anchor on This Week, hosts GMA, so obviously there’s no political agenda. It must have bothered him quite a bit to have to ride the coat rails of corrupt lying scumbags like the Clintons and James Carville. The architects of the modern demokkkrat party strategy of say anything, offer nothing, and encourage hate.
Fortunately the American people chose real leadership for the White House. And we have the strongest economy in half a century thanks to his leadership.
Gd5150 thinks that "The War Room" documents illegal campaign tactics?
Such as?
And Bill Clinton did work while he got his bjs - he famously took PHONE calls during one. He was a known work & policy WONK who took vacations in places where he could attend seminars. He was INTERESTED in policies. And the women who brought rape charges to COURT also famously RECANTED their accusations when they were placed under oath.
Let's see if the 16 women - including someone who was 13 at the time t-Rump assaulted HER - will ever see their day in court.
As for Donald having "the strongest economy in half a century?" - Gd has been drinking the juice from old Toilet Plunger Lips's own mouth. He EXPLODED the deficit to levels that had you GOPRicks apoplectic when Obama spent government funds to stimulate the economy after the GOP/W's GLOBAL FINANCIAL COLLAPSE. And Bill Clinton left a surplu$.
But Gd maligns George Steph and ABC as having a political agenda. LOLOLOL
*I* thought GS bent over backward to let t-Rump speak for himself.
And man, did he speak, huh? He really couldn't keep those Toilet Plunger Lips from demonstrating how little he's learned about the rule of law & the daunting responsibility of his office which he is demonstrably too incompetent to tend.
And Bill Clinton did work while he got his bjs - he famously took PHONE calls during one.
Poor, poor Q.
PPQ.
You saw that as a lionization?
That's on you.
I'm just saying that the man could speak in complete sentences while receiving pleasure (without having to PAY A PORN STAR FOR IT) while simultaneously negotiating with Congress.
Your guy, the Combover Caligula, can't complete any thought or sentence coherently unless it's been reduced to a bumper sticker. We're not talking YUGE brain, despite what he keeps telling you.
Use your own eyes & ears. Read his transcripts. They're not . . . rational.
Also, you need to review the difference between amoral & immoral. And DO tell us which morality bin Trump U committing fraud & Trump Foundation screwing cancer charities fit into. K, Bukkake?
You saw that as a lionization?
That's on you.
I'm just saying that the man could speak in complete sentences while receiving pleasure
Bathroom behavior? You just beg to be mocked, don't you?
Again, PP.
I demonize Donald. You demonize Bill.
What you think is lionization is in your own head.
You're demonstrating that there's not much in the critical thinking section of your brain. You see things? Hear things? Imagine them?
((((That doesn't mean that you need to type them out loud. ))))
My point was, you go on daily attacks of Dems while in your own glass house resides a self-described pussy grabber who HIMSELF went on a radio show to brag about how he abused his ownership of a beauty pageant by OFTEN strolling into the locker rooms where underage girls were dressing.
Donald bragged about this.
Bill Clinton never bragged about his behaviors. Ever.
You want to condemn Bill because he got a blow job 25 years ago? I want to condemn Donald for what he said & did THIS WEEK.
Keep up, will ya PP? Bathroom behaviors. SMDH.
My point was, you go on daily attacks of Dems while in your own glass house resides a self-described pussy grabber who HIMSELF went on a radio show to brag about how he abused his ownership of a beauty pageant by OFTEN strolling into the locker rooms where underage girls were dressing.
Poor, poor, Q.
PPQ.
so... it's not that Donald walked in on women dressing & undressing just for cheap thrills that he brags about to give OTHER people cheap thrills that's your issue, it's the AGE of the girls?
Gotcha.
Important MORAL point, there, DuhQ.
FFS.
so... it's not that Donald walked in on women dressing & undressing just for cheap thrills that he brags about to give OTHER people cheap thrills that's your issue, it's the AGE of the girls?
But Gd maligns George Steph and ABC as having a political agenda. LOLOLOL
Poor Q.
Duh Q.
PPQ.
He announced his donation. He apologized for it.
What you have NOT done is point to any interview, any question or any report that would prove what you're insinuating.
If you saw bias, you neglected to name it.
It's because smearing without substance is the GOP MO.
Also? The Clinton Foundation STILL EXISTS with an A rating from the Chronicle of Philanthropy.
Tell us, dear PP - what happened to the t-Rump Family Charitable Foundation? WHAT? WE CAN'T HEAR YOU!
He announced his donation. He apologized for it.
Thereby vaporizing any impartiality he may ever have wanted to present.
Yet Sean Hannity attends t-Rump Rallies.
And the former managing director of Fox News is part of Donald's entourage.
Laura Ingraham lambasted Donald's own White House staff for 'letting him speak...!'
But in the end, I guess this doesn't matter because practically NO ONE ON EARTH believes that GOP-tv Fox is impartial or unbiased.
Yet Sean Hannity attends t-Rump Rallies.
And the former managing director of Fox News is part of Donald's entourage.
Laura Ingraham lambasted Donald's own White House staff for 'letting him speak...!'
Poor, poor q.
PPQ.
Is the description "fair & balanced" so alien to you that you don't understand the meaning of the words?
Have you not heard Hair Trump call himself the most attacked president in history? Just wondering why you stray so far off the George Steph point of this thread. Is it because you CAN'T supply a question George asked which you believe was slanted?
Donald wasn't FORCED to meet with Stephanopoulos. He invited him into the Oval & gave the interview willingly.
WAH indeed.
George didn't make Donald look like an old cranky loon. Donald opened his own toilet plunger lips & spewed treason & bullshit & nonsense & you plunger lickers blame GEORGE for that?
What pussies!
Have you not heard Hair Trump call himself the most attacked president in history?
The Clinton Foundation STILL EXISTS with an A rating from the Chronicle of Philanthropy.
Trump looked the fool as usual.
Of course, his drones think it was a major triumph as usual.
He played you and Lapdogaloupolus like a cheap fiddle, LOL!
share