MovieChat Forums > Horror > Why is the comedic element so necessary ...

Why is the comedic element so necessary in horror films?


And don't say comic relief. That's a cop out. What I love about horror films (or what I TRY to love about them) is when they firmly grab you by the onions and don't let go for a solid two hours. Don't tell me that comic relief intensifies the scares. Those are just jump scares. Jump scares are not horror. Give me creepy. Give me eerie. Scare the hell out of me. That's what I am there for. If I want to laugh, I'll go see a comedy. If I want to see boobs (and I will never want to see boobs - whole 'nother story, move on), then I'll go see a brainless comedy.

I miss the 70's style horror movies. The Omen, The Exorcist, Rosemary's Baby, The Amityville Horror, Burnt Offerings, The Shining (1980 movie, but filmed in the 70s). Despite its devoted following by horror fans, I feel that Friday the 13th KILLED the horror genre. And I've never forgiven it.

reply

There are few movies that can deliver 2 solid hours of tension, especially for people like me who have been watching horror movies since childhood. If every movie tried to be that way we would just have a lot of tedious horror (we already do). One of my kids liked Annabelle, another liked Babadook. I think they are both boring and neither had any appreciable amount of humor that I remember but it's good we have a variety of horror so that nearly anyone can find things they enjoy. One bad horror film doesn't take away from a good horror film. One film you don't like doesn't take away from one you do. So is comedy necessary? No more than horror itself is necessary.

reply

How did Friday the 13th kill the horror genre?

reply

I hate comedic relief in movies

reply

With all due respect, artguylarry, I think that horror was on life support before Friday The 13th. Till the early Seventies horrors were primarily costume pictures, often set in the past or what felt like the past, as in old dark houses and castles; it was a somewhat ritualized genre, had its own stars, directors, writers and even studios. As this kind of horror, for which I think the word Gothic is the best word to describe, began to fade, big time, in the wake (so to speak) of The Exorcist, truly, the times were changing, as horror was drifting all over the place: a Texas chainsaw here, an Omen there. The relaxation of censorship and movie ratings generally opened the floodgates for a new, more modern kind of horror.

Oh well. Just my opinion. As to humor in horror, it's been there all along, for good or ill. I don't hate it when there's comedy in horror. When it's done well I like it, when it's done badly, I don't. In the days when horrors were less graphic, like back in the middle of the last century, give or take, horror often came from tension, fear of the unknown rather than a swinging axe, blood splattering all over the place. They couldn't show much, so the emphasis was on as much what one couldn't see (and only imagine) as what was there, as in a creaking door, a flash of lightning, rain on the roof, the howling wind, a barking dog or wolf, a sobbing sound coming seemingly from nowhere, and so on and so forth. In such an environment comedy relief helped relieve the tension (it also diverted it), and many people enjoyed it. Even straight horrors featuring vampires, zombies and the like often featured some comedy along the way.

But then movies were so different back in the day: musicals sometimes had tragedies worked into their stories; a movie could be a mystery AND a comedy, and no one minded; a cowboy in an otherwise serious western could burst into song. Films are more serious now, it seems, more linear, clearly defined as to what they're about.

reply