Audited


Trump audited for double-dipping tax breaks on Chicago’s Trump Tower
https://chicago.suntimes.com/nation-world/2024/05/11/trump-tower-chicago-tax-breaks-audit

Former President Donald Trump could be hit with a bill of more than $100 million for claiming improper tax breaks on his namesake tower along the Chicago River, according to a report co-published Saturday by ProPublica and the New York Times.

In a yearslong audit battle, the Internal Revenue Service has argued Trump effectively wrote off the same massive losses twice on the Trump International Hotel and Tower at 401 N. Wabash Ave., ProPublica and the Times found.

Trump reported $651 million in losses on the River North tower in 2008, when he claimed the 92-story building met the tax code definition of “worthless” shortly before its completion during the heart of the Great Recession, the news outlets found.

Then, in 2010, Trump shifted the company that owned the tower into a new partnership, a move he cited to justify $168 million in additional losses over the next 10 years, ProPublica and the Times reported, citing filings in a lawsuit against Trump, a congressional report and an IRS memo.

The current status of the IRS’ audit of Trump and his Chicago dealings is unclear. The agency could seek to recoup more than $100 million, plus interest and potential penalties, the news outlets calculated.

The presumptive Republican presidential nominee’s son Eric Trump, executive vice president of the Trump Organization, told the publications: “This matter was settled years ago, only to be brought back to life once my father ran for office. We are confident in our position, which is supported by opinion letters from various tax experts, including the former general counsel of the IRS.”

An IRS spokesperson declined to comment, citing federal privacy law.

Remember, it is not illegal when Trump does it. :)

reply

Nothing to see here. Just more of Trump winning. 🤣🖕🏻

reply

I call it a win for Americans when people pay their share of taxes.

reply

I agree. I was just being snarky.

reply

Another reason to vote for the lying grifter!

reply