MovieChat Forums > MrAnonymous > Replies
MrAnonymous's Replies
No. Because I would not EVER be in a ring with him regardless of how much money I was offered.
Maybe he felt that his responsibility as an officer was to approach the suspect after he was shot and see if he is still alive, in case he needs to render aid. Remember he does not know Michael is supernatural. To him Michael is an insane killer, but with the exception of Laurie, Loomis and the viewing audience, most rational people would assume he is critically injured, probably dead and no longer a threat.
I'd enjoy if they did a ret-con sequel and pretended all the other sequels didn't exist. If they did that, and convinced Spielberg to direct and brought back Dreyfus I'd be interested. Otherwise I'd say don't flog this dead horse any more.
Agreed. Truthfully I didn't even like the second one. A friend of mine rented the third and I only reluctantly watched it with him (I didn't realize she was in it at first), and when she walks into the hospital during her first scene my interest was piqued. Hers was the only horror movie death that ever saddened me. I read an article where a journalist recommended ret-conning it and pretending away all the other sequels (so she wouldn't be dead), and just treating it like Freddy has been away all this time since the first and I thought it was a great idea.
I fully agree
If they brought both her and Robert Englund back I'd definitely go see it. I'm not one for sequels but that would be good. I wonder if they would ret-con it and pretend that all the other sequels never happened. I read an article where that was suggested.
I always wondered if any of them thought "Oh $#it" the minute he pulled it out. Maybe holding their breath every time he was behind them.
That scene made me cringe, as son as he approached them. He should have locked down the house and protected his family.
Other than these two reviewers how many others complained?
The more someone wears their virtues on their sleeve, the more they signal those virtues......the less they live up to those virtues when people are not looking. Be they left wing or right wing this almost always proves true.
Jimmy Swaggart, and Elen Degeneres.....two people who preached until they were blue in the face yet both were wolves in sheeps clothing.
Sherriff's don't get to pick and chose who can be in their town based solely on how they look. Sure you can keep an eye on any newcomers who look sketchy but Rambo had the right to be there.
I never saw him being portrayed as a hero at all, but rather a redemption story. He was portrayed as a man who initially was a slimy opportunist who would ally with anyone if it served his interests, but who could not stomach the horrors of what he had involved himself in and chose to do what he needed to to try to save as many as he could from a situation he had initially been complicit in.
It let's Wild Bill off bit to easy but it was the only way to get rid of Percy
It's a hard call, but I'd say Percy. He just loved having power over people and using it as sadistically as possible. Hadley for all his brutality seemed to at least be a bit more predictable. While I don't agree with Hadley's over the top brutal responses to prisoner's who get out of line, at least with him I'd feel confident that I know how to avoid his wrath just by laying low and not attracting attention to myself.
It happens a lot in boxing. Many champs have a long undefeated streak because they were picky about their opponents.
I always wonder why criminals don't have a retirement plan in place. At the time the words focus was on Columbia, so Sosa could have stayed below radar had he kept his operation smaller. Over the years he could have invested his drug money into some legitimate enterprises and at a certain point pick a protégée to take over his drug empire as he retires with about 100 million dollars and businesses that bring in about ten million per year. Once the journalist started chatting about him he could have taken that as his cue to step aside for a younger drug leader and enjoyed his retirement while showing reporters his legitimate businesses.
I realize this is probably unrealistic as it would be hard to step away from such wealth and power, but it baffles me that some don't consider this.
I'd be the banker who told Tony he had to raise his rates. Making a fortune off of drug money without risking incarceration or death.
Had he played his cards right in their final conversation he could have saved the situation. Sosa might not have a conscience, but he was a shrewd enough man to realize that two children being blown up with a bomb in New York would bring about public and media attention that would do far more damage than the journalist talking about him. All tony had to do was tactfully point out that had he let the bomb go off Sosa's face would be on the front of every newspaper around the world.
Makes me wonder if Tony had the foresight to have a will made up, maybe dividing his assets up between his mother, sister and Elvira